Posts Tagged ‘jason wilson’

Colossal Update!

wilseyalso1

an excuse to put my ugly mug at the top of the site by Jason Wilson

Well hello there. The last couple months have seen what some might have expected to be the end of Unfiltered Smoke. This is not exactly the case. Isaac and myself have not at all lost interest but as in with other endeavours life has gotten in the way. I don’t think I need to get into the particulars but we have been working on finishing up our novel we have been writing for over a year together, which has become first priority.

Second, we stopped getting submissions. I do have another photo series from Nick Lamont and that will go up tomorrow or even later tonight but other than that it all stopped at once. Now I’m not blaming anyone, what I expect was that people saw the site was no longer active and thus decided it wouldn’t be in their best interest to submit. We are always open to submissions even if (or perhaps especially) if we appear MIA.

I could have likely updated the site daily or at least regularly with my own pontifications on the world of art but the idea that brought this site to fruition to begin with was that it would be a collective. If it’s only myself or Isaac and I, then it’s nothing more than another blog. While we have blog-like elements I like to think we draw from a slew of media that elevate it above the typical diary-like writings of so many blogs out there. Of course it is so difficult to classify as Deadspin is a sports blog but brings in actual news stories and is more of a comedy routine in most of the posts. It’s opinion based but not in a rambling manner.

At any rate, the internet is a tough nut to crack and yet I still believe we can make this site a success. I’m not talking in financial terms because I certainly am not making money. But I believe we can successfully promote the arts, be it music, writing, drawing, painting, photography or ideas in general. This update has been a long time coming and should have happened before the turn of April.

Brief Criterion Conquest:

Amarcord (1974)
Directed by Federico Fellini

 amarcord

A comedy…in fascist Italy? Well that’s basically what Amarcord is, or it’s at least a very whimsical depiction of what life in Italy during WW2 might have been like. It was loosely based on Fellini’s own experiences as a youngster and shows how adolescence and sexual awakening is difficult in any country. That sort of development doesn’t simply stop because a war is on or someone happens to be brought up on the opposing side. He brought a decidedly human perspective to the fascist reign of Mussolini.

It’s like a carnival and features many dream sequences that further the idea that many people of the time may have ignored that the war was going on or recognized it but tried to distance it by going on with their lives. Otherwise, what could you do? Of course, there are moments of weight that include an interrogation of the main boy’s father who is suspected of working against the government. This corresponds with a political rally where characters you’ve grown fond of show their undying support for Mussolini who history has proven was one of the worst tyrants imaginable…or at least that’s what the history books tell us. Perhaps for these people at least in Italy it wasn’t so bad. The film allows the viewer to imagine a different perspective or an alternate view of the war. It doesn’t mean you have to all of a sudden pump your fist in support of Mussolini, far from it. I’m rambling…it’s been a couple months since I actually watched it. Either way it is a fantastic film that everyone should give a watch. Then you’ll know what I mean…or you’ll think I’m insane or way off base with my interpretation. Such is the folly of criticism.

Army of Shadows (1969)
Directed by Jean-Pierre Melville

armyofshadows

On an opposite, perhaps more traditional take on the Second World War, Melville’s dark and depressing tale of underground rebels fighting against the Nazi’s is possibly one of my now favourite movies set in war times. It doesn’t rely on a ton of bells and whistles and instead focuses entirely on the quiet nature before and after violence. The choice these people had was to fight back through espionage or die in camps. Unfortunately, betrayal was not as uncommon as the resistance hoped for as some members saw an opportunity to help their family by providing information.

Guilt, paranoia, desperation and desire to be free are all powerful themes and when mixed together the way Melville does here is incredible. I’ve seen his film Le Samourai and was blown away, especially when I found out it was a huge influence on Jim Jarmusch’s Ghost Dog.

I skipped down the list by a long shot and I figure any time I add another it will not be in chronological order. Just saying.

So yes, we will have periodic updates that are certainly more regular than they have been the last little while. Please send new submissions if you like, we will put them up. Thank you for your readership!

Criterion Conquest: The Lady Vanishes

LadyVanishesCriterion

by Jason Wilson

The Lady Vanishes (1938)
Directed by Alfred Hitchcock
Screenplay by Sidney Gilliat and Frank Launder
Based on the story “The Wheel Spins” by Ethel Lina White
Starring Margaret Lockwood, Michael Redgrave, Paul Lukas, Dame May Whitty, Naunton Wayne and Basil Radford.

If anyone becomes a film buff, or even casual enthusiast of cinema, it is impossible to ignore Alfred Hitchcock. It is easy, however, to look past much of his work because of titles like Psycho, Rear Window, North by Northwest, The Birds and Vertigo. Those five films were the ones I immediately thought of when I heard his name. They are linked to his icon’s stature and some of his earlier films, particularly those he made in England before emigrating to the United States, get lost in the shuffle.

Obviously, film historians have plowed through his earlier work but not everyone has the time, resources or gumption to do that. Luckily, Criterion has made a few of his less mainstream films available, though some are now out of print. The Lady Vanishes was actually re-released in a two-disc set a couple years ago and is still readily available now. It seems that out of the gate, Criterion was more interested in the movie as a stand-alone and neglected the special features until re-releases down the road. Seven Samurai got the upgrade and a nearly bare-bones edition of The Lady Vanishes did as well.

The following review will contain some spoilers, so read on with caution.

ladyvanishes

The opening sequence in the film introduces two lads named Caldicott and Charters. They are proper, slightly snooty and massive cricket fans. Ostensibly, they seem to be the protagonists of the film, only their shenanigans serve as a light introduction to their surroundings. They are holed up in a hotel waiting, along with all the other patrons, for a delayed train to London. Caldicott and Charters pop up now and again and serve mostly as a bumbling comic relief, though the movie is never all that bleak to begin with. There is an air of whimsy about it perpetuated largely by leading man Michael Redgrave.

Redgrave (father of actresses Vanessa and Lynn) plays Gilbert, a musicologist full of smarm and wit. He is handsome but his charms are less defined than his snide and selfish attitude. For the early scenes, Gilbert is more of a pest than either a protagonist or antagonist, though it is obvious from the first scene he shares with Margaret Lockwood’s Iris that he will be her knight in shining armour by the end of it. Maybe it wasn’t so predictable at the time of release, but 70 years later plot conventions have a tendency to be repetitive so even though it is a precursor to many similar films, I saw it later. This is not a complaint. I’d rather twists occur naturally instead of being forced (M. Night Shyamalan since Signs for instance) and at least Gilbert’s ascension to protector and co-conspirator comes across as organic and believable. To have it happen any other way would not have made sense.

Which brings us to Iris. Iris complains about music being too loud in the room above her at the hotel and Gilbert gets kicked out of his room only to forcibly shack up in her room when he figures out who ratted on him. She relents under pressure and he gets his room back. She, naturally, hates him and his boorish behaviour. The next day, awaiting the train, Iris takes a potted plant off the noggin. It was pushed from a window above her by an unknown person. Iris befriends an old lady by the name of Miss Froy who helps her to her spot on the train. They converse, have tea and Iris has a nap. She awakes to discover Miss Froy is gone and no one in her carriage or on the rest of the train seems to have any knowledge of the older lady. Did the plant cause her to hallucinate or is there a conspiracy afoot?

Obviously it’s a conspiracy. Hitchcock plays with the possibility that she may have dreamed it all and that Iris is in fact concussed but the clues slowly mount until the players are in place and the audience knows who is on which side. And here comes a spoiler! The doctor, whom Gilbert and Iris had confided in (you can always trust a doctor!) is the primary conspirator on the train who abducted Miss Froy. He is accompanied by a woman dressed as a nun. This is the point of contention I have with the film along with the fact that Miss Froy was a spy…well who suspects the elderly, I guess. The nun, on a dime, turns on the doctor and other cohorts to help Gilbert and Iris save Miss Froy (this is still before the climax of the film). Her motivation seems to be that she didn’t sign on to be an accomplice to murder. It seems too convenient and more of a plot contrivance than a true development of character. While the relationship between Gilbert and Iris develops organically, the nun is barely more than a cardboard cutout.

Then again, the specifics about why Miss Froy was captured, what the doctor wants, the political motivations, are all intentionally vague, glossed over or left out altogether. The why is unimportant as Iris herself is mostly ignorant to the reasons but is simply trying to save her new friend regardless of the situation. So the audience is left in the dark much like the protagonist and is left to enjoy the banter and tension without thinking too hard. It’s a fluffy film with a darker subtext of political oppression. The Lady Vanishes is an enjoyable effort but lacks the gravitas and intensity that made Hitchcock’s later work so powerful and impressive. It’s still worth a watch because it is very entertaining and has some amusing characters, though others are underused and just there (though the judge avoiding public scorn is punished for his cowardice, so he does have purpose).

lady_vanishes143

Among the special features is a featurette narrated by Hitchcock scholar Leonard Leff. He goes in depth about the making of the film and the distinction of calling Hitchcock a thrill maker. Hitchcock apparently was seldom regarded as an artist in those days and received little funding or respect despite his films being financially successful. Leff provides some fascinating information, but his delivery is fairly bland.

He says the movie was filmed almost entirely on a 90-foot set acting as the train. Hitchcock used the same carriage chambers over and over again and otherwise used miniatures and models for outside shots, especially noticeable in the opening sequence at the hotel.

Leff also acknowledges much of what I considered shortcomings and while knowing a lot of the misinformation or lack of information entirely was on purpose, it doesn’t exactly improve my thoughts on those aspects. While Hitchcock might not have wanted to dwell on the minutia of the details, I would have liked to have known why these people were thrust into such a dire string of events. The Lady Vanishes is still exceptionally entertaining and if you enjoy Caldicott and Charters, you are treated to a feature length movie with them at the center called Crook’s Tour. It had never been released on home video until the Criterion two-disc of the Lady Vanishes.

Rounding it out is a commentary track from film historian Bruce Eder, a couple new essays and excerpts from a radio interview between Hitchcock and filmmaker Francois Truffaut (whose 400 Blows is coming up soon in the Criterion Conquest!).

I encourage you to check out The Lady Vanishes unless you hate old films for some irrational reason. “Eww, black and white!” Otherwise it’s worth a glance just to see Hitchcock in action years before his biggest films cemented him as the icon of suspense he is to this day.

Next up on the Criterion Conquest: Federico Fellini’s Amarcord

Criterion Conquest: Seven Samurai


2.sevensamurai

by Jason Wilson

Seven Samurai (1954)
Directed by Akira Kurosawa
Written by Akira Kurosawa, Shinobu Hashimoto and Hideo Oguni
Starring Takashi Shimura, Yoshio Inaba, Daisuke Kato, Minoru Chiaki, Isao Kimura, Seiji Miyaguchi and Toshiro Mifune.

It took me a long time to fully immerse myself in foreign films. I was all about the Hollywood system and watched the Oscars every year like a good little boy and accepted that they were pretty much spot on (though I never agreed with Dances With Wolves over Goodfellas or Titanic over L.A. Confidential). I can’t say for sure but I don’t think it was until university where I decided to dabble with foreign language films. High school was my discovery phase of film in general. I started with the newer stuff and slowly took in the Godfather films and older Spielberg stuff like Jaws and even some Kubrick and Hitchcock.

*A quick note: Access was always a problem. I lived in rural New Brunswick and foreign films weren’t at the ready until the last couple years. Even now classic foreign movies like anything by Kurosawa are hard to come by in my hometown.*

After a couple film classes here and there, my appreciation for global cinema started to breathe. I had started watching old Westerns by Sergio Leone like Fistful of Dollars and learned it was based on Yojimbo, another Kurosawa movie. Through my reading I came to learn The Magnificent Seven was not an original story but one based on Seven Samurai. Luckily, living in Fredericton, I was able to find a rental copy and it blew me away.

Cut to several years later and I’ve seen a fair chunk of Kurosawa’s filmography but had yet to revisit the one that got me started. I’m an obsessive and tend to re-watch movies multiple times, especially the ones I love and even some I hate (I’ve seen Daredevil three times). I figured I could definitely stand to watch Seven Samurai again.

seven_samurai01_b1

It’s a sprawling epic that embarrasses pretty much any of its kind released today. It’s a deep character study with intensity and wild action and swordplay. It’s three and a half hours long but the time is used economically and not a minute is wasted. Each of the seven ronin are fully developed and maintain their own identity, none of them are one-dimensional characters and none are used as mere window dressing. Even the supposed secondary characters like the farmers they are hired to protect are presented with depth and dignity unseen in many epics of today (I will give credit to Braveheart in this regard though, Gibson and company had a colourful cast of people in that flick).

The story in a nutshell is a group of bandits are discovered to be plotting a raid on a village of farmers once their barley harvest is ready. The farmers decide, at the behest of an elder, to hire samurai to protect the village. Kanbei (played by the fantastic Takashi Shimura) is the first one recruited. He’s an aging samurai without a master expecting to live out the rest of his days as a vagabond. Out of a sense of duty to morality he takes on the farmer’s cause even though he knows he may die and they cannot pay him. He slowly recruits others and the seven of them journey to the village to prepare for the onslaught.

It follows a formula of the lone wolf hero (multiplied by seven) or gun for hire but focuses on the human elements of the story. But it’s not treated as above the action. Instead the characters, the story, the action and the themes are all treated as equal and thus the film is one of the most well rounded and thoughtful action films ever committed to film. Kikuchiyo (Toshiro Mifune) could easily be considered the comic relief but in the same breath he could be considered the most tragic character among the samurai. His past his slowly revealed as the movie progresses; there are hints and guesses by other characters until he has two specific breaking points where he reveals his lineage and history.

It’s incredible because in many stories like this a love story will seem completely out of place but Kurosawa even gets that right. The farmers don’t trust the samurai even though they rely on them for their salvation. The farmers force their daughters to cut their hair and dress like boys so they will not fall into the romantic trap of the village protectors. Of course this has to be visited again later on and it addresses the disparity between social classes and the idea that love between two people regardless of their status is a beautiful thing. Kurosawa and his co-writers Hashimoto and Oguni put together a complex yet simple to understand story that works on every aspect of humanity. It lives up to the hype because it takes itself seriously with a sense of whimsy.

SevenSamurai

The three-disc edition released by the Criterion Collection is one of the best DVDs ever released. While the special features may seem minimal despite the three discs, it makes up for it with the quality of each. There are two feature-length commentaries (neither of which I was able to listen to…I must purchase this DVD). One by five film scholars and the other by Japanese film expert Michael Jeck.

There are two 50-minute documentaries; one on the making of the film itself and another on the impact of samurai cinema and traditions and how Kurosawa was influenced. There’s also a two-hour long interview with Kurosawa himself from 1993 (he died in 1998) with filmmaker Nagisa Oshima covering most of the films of his career and his early life as well. If you purchase the DVD you’ll also get a booklet of essays on the film. By the end you’ll know all you need to know so you can brag to all your friends about your expertise on the samurai genre. The Seven Samurai set provides an intimate look at Kurosawa and what many consider his masterpiece (take imdb with a grain of salt but this film rests at #15 on their top 250 of all time).

It’s a humanistic movie with amazing action and intensity. It doesn’t feel like its runtime, if anything it feels like it should be longer. That’s not to say Kurosawa left anything out, he didn’t, but by the end the audience is so attached to the goings on that more of the story would be welcome. Instead we can revisit it over and over again. I gladly will…if for no other reason than I should see it more times than I’ve seen Daredevil.

Next on the Criterion Conquest: Alfred Hitchcock’s The Lady Vanishes

The Movies of the Oughts

wilseyalso1

a superfluous list by Jason Wilson

When I got the idea to put together a series of lists based on the opinions of friends and colleagues about the best media had to offer since 2000 I thought it would be a fun exercise. We get to look back and analyze the movies, music, television, books, etc. that meant the most to us over the last ten years. Of course these lists always bring out the wolves challenging your choices and that’s half the fun.

Movies have meant a lot to me since I was young. My folks rented me Dumbo and I watched it obsessively. It’s still my favourite non-Pixar Disney movie, based mostly on nostalgia. Since then, and maybe my parents regret it, they have been responsible for my growing love of cinema. They took me to Ghostbusters and Jurassic Park. When I was 13, they rented Goodfellas and I somehow managed to convince them to let me stay in the room despite the amount of vulgarity and violence. So here I sit, with thousands of dollars invested in a movie collection and I like to think I’m a reasonably well-adjusted individual despite my movie geek status. Then again I had initially compiled a list of my top 100 of the decade. I’ll spare you that whole list.

Honourable mentions: Up in the Air (2009 – Jason Reitman), Memento (2000 – Chris Nolan), There Will Be Blood (2007 – PT. Anderson), The Departed (2007 – Martin Scorsese), The Damned United (2009 – Tom Hooper), The Life Aquatic (2004 – Wes Anderson), Traffic (2000 – Steven Soderbergh), Shaun of the Dead (2004 – Edgar Wright), Sin City (2005 – Robert Rodriguez), Kill Bill 1 & 2 (2003-04 – Quentin Tarantino), Requiem For a Dream (2000 – Darren Aronofsky), Spider (2002 – David Cronenberg), Oldboy (2003 – Park Chan-wook), Big Fish (2003 – Tim Burton), Into the Wild (2007 – Sean Penn), Wonder Boys (2000 – Curtis Hanson).

And now, onto the top 10!

10. The Royal Tenenbaums (2001 – Wes Anderson)

tenenbaums

I was living in Halifax when Tenenbaums came out. It looked like a quirky, funny movie and while it certainly was it ended up being much more than that. It’s a portrait of a broken family seemingly beyond repair, a cautionary tale that skill and money and success does not ensure your happiness in the world. If you act like a shit you’re going to feel like it eventually. 2001, I was fresh out of high school, living on my own for the first time and still figuring out what kind of person I am. Tenenbaums is hilarious but at the same time it shows the audience a glimpse of cartoonish reality hinged on despair and missed opportunities. It has forever forged an important connection to my heart because of its honesty and lack of compromise.

9. Broken Flowers (2005 – Jim Jarmusch)

broken flowers

Bill Murray’s renaissance has been built upon playing aging men whose lives have passed them by. After a string of terrible flops after the great Groundhog Day in 93, he reinvented himself in Wes Anderson’s Rushmore. Since then he has adopted the sad sack persona in film and hasn’t been better than here. While many credit Lost in Translation as his magnum opus as an actor, it’s Broken Flowers that I took to. Sexual conquest is a stereotypical rite of passage for men and he exemplified one such character. He made it rich, had fling after fling, and now stares mortality with the cold realization of the inevitable. But he doesn’t just sit there. He hits the road to trace his steps to find both a potential son and a greater meaning to all he has been and all he has done. It’s a bittersweet tale that fuels wanderlust and a longing to reconnect with those who have disappeared from our lives over the years.

8. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005 – Shane Black)

kiss_kiss_bang_bang

What a pleasant surprise. Robert Downey Jr. and Val Kilmer in their finest form and a sharp performance from Michelle Monaghan who has not been this good since. It’s comic noir in the vein of Raymond Chandler and before HBO hit the scene with Bored to Death last fall. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang takes the private detective motif and spins it on its head while maintaining many of the old conventions of the days of Bogart and Bacall. Downey plays a chronic screw up, which he’s good at since, well, he is one as far as his media coverage has led me to believe. But he is on a quest for some sort of redemption, fixing his past mistakes. Mix that journey with a bunch of slapstick, great dialogue and a bunch of twists and turns and you have one of the most entertaining movies of the decade.

7. Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino)

inglourious-basterds

I wasn’t going to include this. I hadn’t had the opportunity to see my favourites from 2009 a second time to verify my initial reactions until over New Year’s I watched Basterds again with a few friends. It was better the second time through and I am inclined to say it’s my favourite Tarantino film. From the opening sequence, an intense interrogation fueled by dialogue with music and shots straight from the best Sergio Leone; to Melanie Laurent as Shoshanna in the restaurant years later with a glass of milk in front of her; to the proper German way to order three scotches; Inglourious Basterds is equally entertaining and suspenseful. Then the Basterds themselves come in and punctuate the proceedings with a comic bookish flare that truly sets this apart from your standard WW2 flick.

6. No Country for Old Men (2007 – Joel and Ethan Coen)

nocountryoldmen

No Country for Old Men is a rare beast. You could miss the real story the first time through. Sure, the surface plot is a chase between an arrogant man taking a chance with a stolen sack of cash and the psychopathic hunter chasing him down. Maybe it’s been beaten into the heads of everyone by now and it might be more obvious than I’m giving people credit for (it’s the meaning of the title for the love of God!). But it’s how the old sheriff has reached his limits of understanding how to deal with the world and the violence therein. Nothing has really changed in the world itself except he no longer has the capability to deal with it. It’s a young man’s game and his old guard is losing its grip. Of course the chase itself is such an incredibly woven story that it becomes the front-loaded storyline, though there is good reason why Moss’ fate happens offscreen. In my opinion, it’s even more effective this way.

Oh, and of course, Javier Bardem and Josh Brolin are both amazing.

5. High Fidelity (2000 – Stephen Frears)

hf

My mother read Nick Hornby’s book High Fidelity several years ago. I had already seen the movie…probably three times by then. She laughed and said “you are Rob Gordon.” Now considering my unhealthy appreciation for all things John Cusack I was elated. The more I thought about it I’m sure she meant it was due to my compulsive list-making (no shock there) and my overall neurotic behaviour. This could be seen as a more light-hearted sister movie to the aforementioned Broken Flowers. Rob Gordon, like Bill Murray’s Don Johnston loses a love and is forced to look deep within himself and his past relationships. The humour is what really sets this one apart along with the supporting cast including Jack Black, Tim Robbins, Todd Louiso and Iben Hjejle. It has one of the best soundtracks around and talks about music in the way music lovers do…yes we are that abrasive…

4. Children of Men (2006 – Alfonso Cuaron)

children_of_men

The top of this list is mostly interchangeable. Hell, the whole top ten are movies I can watch over and over again. Children of Men is one I paid to see twice in theaters. It’s a perfect film experience and I wasn’t prepared for what I was getting into. It’s an apocalyptic tale that while it’s still very far-fetched is played out with so seriously that it becomes believable. That’s the difficulty with science fiction. Within the context of the story it is real. It helps that it is filmed with a tenacity filled with honest performances and an amazing script. You can’t help but get lost in the narrative and the sense of hope permeating throughout its bleak landscape.

3. City of God (2002 – Fernando Mereilles)

city-of-god

The ultimate gut punch of a movie. An unflinching account of the side of paradise not known to tourists and the struggles to survive in extreme poverty. It’s a beautiful movie where hopes and dreams are by and large crushed but a sliver of optimism remains. I’m sure if you’ve been told about City of God, chances are it’s been recommended to you as a must see. The violence isn’t glorified. Not a shot is wasted. And in this case, the lack of known actors helps the wallop the movie carries with it. There is never a separation from the story as it is woven. One of the most absorbing movies of the decade.

2. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004 – Michel Gondry)

eternal_sunshine

Falling in love and falling out of love are two of the most universal experiences we share. And yet, Eternal Sunshine is unlike any other portrayal of love and loss in the history of film. It goes beyond the non-linear storytelling too. Sure, it’s science fiction and completely off the deep end in terms of plot believability but in terms of how realistic the relationship between Joel and Clementine is, it’s something I think most of us would be able to relate to. Watching Joel relive all the terrible moments of his relationship as his memories disappear only to realize he’s getting rid of the good ones too and wants to stop is harrowing. Looking back on relationships, we isolate the good and bad but they are not exclusive. It’s a harsh reality, but love is never all roses no matter what tricks we play on ourselves.

1. Zodiac (2007 – David Fincher)

zodiac-movie

It’s a serial killer movie with more in common with All the President’s Men than with Fincher’s previous effort Se7en. It’s a procedural piece and a tale of obsession in the face of fear. Maybe it’s the journalist in me that elevates this movie as high as it is but I never feel like I’ve watched a three-hour movie when it finishes. I had just gotten a job at a Chapters in Fredericton when this was released in theaters. Bought my ticket on my lunch break and when they asked if I could stay later on my first day of work I told them I couldn’t because I had a movie to see. Good thing too because my love of Zodiac grows every day. The look and feel of the film is sharp yet gritty. It makes general assumptions about the truth but mostly because it is told from a very specific perspective (Robert Graysmith, who wrote the book it is based on). As long as you don’t hold it as 100 per cent accurate it should still provide an amazing portrait of the early 1970s in San Francisco and surrounding areas. This is easily my favourite David Fincher film, though Se7en is still right up there.

Epilogue

I numbered them though it was unnecessary. It was mostly because while they are interchangeable, Eternal Sunshine and Zodiac are the two above the rest for me and to run them in any other sequence would have ruined it…for me…remember, I’m a compulsive list making Rob Gordon type, though I don’t own my own record store.

Within the next couple weeks or so, these lists will have run their course. It was a fun exercise and I hope readers have enjoyed them. Now we can get back to original pieces, etc. that were the basis of the website in the first place. My goal, a resolution perhaps, is to get more fiction on the site as well as artwork. As much as I love writing, I was hoping to maintain a balance with the other art forms. Remember, if you ever wish to contribute, just drop a line.

Jason

Up in the Air

wilseyalso1

a contemplative review by Jason Wilson

upintheair-3

Up in the Air (2009)
Directed by Jason Reitman
Screenplay by Jason Reitman & Sheldon Turner
Based on the novel by Walter Kirn
Starring George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, Anna Kendrick, Jason Bateman, Danny McBride, Melanie Lynskey, JK Simmons, Zach Galifianakis, and Sam Elliott

Movies aren’t only about escaping, this much should be obvious. Sometimes a movie comes along where its subject matter fits the time period when it is released. Up in the Air is one of these movies. And while it has some laughs, it is not an uplifting film but there is a sense of hope underlying it.

Ryan Bingham (Clooney) fires people for a living. He is hired by companies to let their employees whom are no longer needed go. Considering the climate of careers and the global economy during the past year, the firing scenes alone should resonate with most viewers. Times aren’t easy and who knows if the job supporting your family will be there a week from now, a month from now or a year from now.

Bingham spends next to no time at rest in what most people call a “home”. He travels constantly as he is sent from city to city to fire people he has never met and will never see again. He doesn’t believe in the fairy tale existence of falling in love and living happily ever after. He moonlights as a motivational speaker reminiscent of Kerouac as he preaches from his corporate pulpit that our material possessions weigh us down to the point of paralysis.

Unlike Kerouac, Bingham believes the relationships in our lives weigh us down even more. He purposefully rejects the notion of getting close to others. Instead, he relies on acquaintances; not friends. Even his family is kept at a distance. Of course, through the duration of the film he meets someone with the potential of changing his worldview. At first she is essentially a female version of him. “Just think of me as you, only with a vagina,” she says to him at one point. Bingham has a philosophy about filling a backpack with all the things in life weighing you down but what he seems to fail to grasp (most of the time) is what’s left if all we do is avoid commitment and connections?

Now I’m not talking about the material possessions, he might be right about that one. But what’s obvious is that it is the friendships, the romances, the relationships with family that truly matter. If we abandon these, there is nothing else left. Sure we can lose our jobs but it’d be much worse to lose the people around you who are there for you when you’re down. We create so much drama every day that causes tiny rifts with those we care about. Some are fused back together and others are never the same. For whatever reason, we haven’t learned how to fully cohabitate with one another. The solution is not to follow Bingham’s example, though he might have a point.

Cherish the relationships with loved ones. Treat them like gold but at the same time balance it with care for yourself. There is a scene in Up in the Air where Bingham fires a man and points to the man’s resume. Before he started a career with the office he had worked at for decades, he had gone to school to be a chef. Bingham tells him he now has the opportunity and the time to pursue the thing that makes him happy.

Ryan Bingham isn’t supposed to be the hero of a generation, he’s just barely coasting by as the people he could have cared for are drifting further away. He’s a cautionary tale that we can get wrapped up in our own bravura and slogans and philosophies that we ignore the warning signs that life is getting away from us. How many people are stuck in jobs they hate only to get laid off and have no other apparent options? If we’re all going to sink we might as well try our best to live out our damn dreams. Otherwise what is it all for? I don’t have the answers, maybe if I keep looking I’ll find them or maybe I won’t. But I won’t work in another call center ever again.

A good film entertains you. A great film forces you to re-evaluate life and consider the possibilities therein. Up in the Air is the latter.

The Damned United

the-damned-united

a review by Jason Wilson

The Damned United (2009)
Directed by Tom Hooper
Written by Peter Morgan based on the novel by David Pearce
Starring Michael Sheen, Colm Meany, Timothy Spall and Jim Broadbent

How healthy is rivalry? We’re taught from a young age that competition is a fine thing. It gets kids involved in sport and introduces them to the cutthroat adult world in the form of dodgeball, baseball and in this case football (or soccer for most around these parts).

We care what the outcome of a game is so much more than seems logical because the game becomes more than just a game. Ask any Toronto Maple Leafs or Montreal Canadiens fans about the rivalry between the two teams. There is a bloodthirsty hatred between the fans of these teams; not only the players but those who watch the games at home and aren’t relying on the team for a paycheck. In fact, the fan has more of a vested interest in the outcome in a way, at least at it pertains to a specific team. A player moves from team to team freely through trades and free agency. A fan doesn’t change allegiances. In most cases, once you find your team, it’s your team for life.

Then there are those that get indoctrinated in the game and obsess over personal success. Brian Clough is one of these men. The Damned United is not about soccer or sport like many sport films are. It’s not about the purity or beauty of football/soccer. It’s not about the success of a team though it focuses on the rise and fall of the teams under coach Clough. It is instead a portrait of obsession, arrogance and greed (but not the monetary kind).

The rivalry between Clough and former coach of Leeds United Don Revie stems from what seems like an innocuous occasion. Clough, coaching lowly (at the time) Derby is snubbed by Revie after a game against the far superior (at the time) Leeds. Revie doesn’t shake his hand or acknowledge his existence. Until that moment, Clough revered the Leeds coach as a god of the sport. Revie was looked at as a giant, and Clough was nobody.

Spite and bitterness drive Clough to turn Derby into a winning team. He obtains players by spending his boss’ money and brashly insults the chairman for being stingy when he complains. It works, and Derby becomes a winner but Clough doesn’t win any friends and his relationship with the club is soon shaky and less certain than before.

As the film is advertised, The Damned United appears to be about the 44 days Clough coached Leeds after Revie left to coach the England national team. But that only puts the plot into its historical context. The film uses soccer/football as a backdrop. It’s the overwhelming need to prove he’s better, more important to the game and more innovative than Revie. It also seems like a plea for his former idol, now arch rival to notice and appreciate Clough’s talents.

Sheen as Brian Clough

Sheen as Brian Clough

What Clough doesn’t realize is that his ambitions overshadow his strengths and blind him to the people who surround him; those that made him the coach and person he is. It wasn’t just his young approach that helped Derby rise from the boot of a secondary league/division to renown in the Premiership. He was but a cog in the wheel and his arrogance got the better of him.

The Damned United is the best film centered on the world of sport in years possibly because it distances itself from the game for most of the movie. There are only a couple sequences on the pitch and never for longer than a minute. It’s not important to see how the team performs in the scheme of it. It’s the rivalry and competition inside Clough and Revie that drive the movie.

Films like Cinderella Man and Miracle opine too freely on the beauty of the sports represented therein while The Damned United doesn’t glorify it. Competition isn’t always healthy. Sport isn’t always about the little guy overcoming the obstacles to achieve greatness. More often than not, rivalry is petty and worthless. In a fantastic sequence near the end, the sheer lunacy of the rivalry is exposed during a television interview with the two coaches. It puts the whole story into perspective and thankfully Clough is not painted as a hero like he might have been in a different filmmaker’s hands.

Jealousy and pride are never good reasons to try to succeed. It taints the final product. Clough achieved great feats with Derby but it wasn’t good enough because he still measured himself against someone else. Someone who really only existed in his mind that kept growing above his own advancements. The secret is to chop that guy down before losing yourself in the shadows.

In the Loop

in-the-loop-poster_280x415 a review by Jason Wilson

In the Loop (2009)
Directed by Armando Iannucci
Written by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci and Tony Roche
Starring Peter Capaldi, Tom Hollander, Gina McKee, James Gandolfini, Chris Addison and David Rasche

Is war unforeseeable? The use of that word in particular to describe conflict is what sets In the Loop off into the chaotic stratosphere where it remains for the entire runtime. It brushes with confusion, idiocy and mounds of profanity to produce one of the best comedies in cinema of recent memory.

So I ask again, is war unforeseeable? What exactly would that statement mean? Are there no warning signs or potential tip offs? Is war simply a random collision of conflicting ideas like a barroom brawl on an astronomically larger scale? And if it isn’t unforeseeable, does that mean it is…foreseeable?

While a comedy, first and foremost must achieve laughs as far as its classification within genre is concerned, when a comedy actually has something to say or at least attempts to shine a light on a potential societal problem, it can become more than a comedy.

American Beauty prodded at the obsession with materialism with a mix of humour and a bleak outlook on suburban life. Wes Anderson has made a career of obsessing over broken familial relationships with a scathing dry wit. So here’s a war movie that instead of focusing on the body count and the gore on the front lines, the filmmakers hone in on the sheer absurdity found within the bureaucratic sphere. There is a fantastic bit that goes from the beginning to the end of the film about a government report outlining the pros and cons of war while the government is trying to decide to go to war. The document has more cons and if the report were to be leaked it would cause a bit of a roadblock when it came to entering the war. Now, no one is openly for going to war but any time the negativity is expressed it is obvious that war is the preferred outcome to the higher ups.

Along with the political satire and the annihilation of the bureaucratic process (something I never get sick of seeing), In the Loop provides a Lost In Translation element between two english speaking nations. In many aspects both sides are saying the same thing but are never on the same page. It’s dry and subtle mixed in with creative combinations of vulgarities. The comedy somehow uses the best of both worlds and it achieves balance.

film-review-in-the-loop__1248381333_5924

It is an ensemble piece and although Peter Capaldi commands the camera more than anyone else, his Malcolm Tucker is not the lead. He is a loud, angry Scot who muscles everyone around thriving on the stammering weak who surround him. In fact, the two prominent Scottish characters are portrayed in the same way while the English are quiet and reserved attempting to avoid conflict at all costs while still heading into a war.

The Americans then are essentially shown as compulsive liars, opportunists and hypochondriacs. Not only to the Brits but to one another. From the start of the movie, everyone is at each other’s throats trying to calm down the mistake of one cabinet minister referring to a war as unforeseeable while the poor bastard is torn back and forth as all he ever wanted to do as a politician was help people. In the end, he can’t even keep a wall from falling down.

In the Loop is sharp and moves along at a great pace. Iannucci and company have crafted a smart observation at the vanity and overall clusterfuck involved with managing countries in war times and it’s a shame it hasn’t gotten more press despite wall to wall great reviews. The laughs are subtle most of the time resulting in more of an inward hilarity with occasional moments where the audience should be unable to hold it in. At the very least, you should get a chuckle at Malcolm’s creative combos of insults.

Greatest Hits?

wilsey by Jason Wilson

So it has come to this. The Foo Fighters are releasing a greatest hits album. In general, I have a disdain for greatest hits records. More often than not, all it is is a re-packaging of the singles heard round the world a million times over. It seems superfluous to the hardcore fan of the band as we likely have all their records anyway. Compilation records of a band rarely work unless they are a live album/dvd.

In this case fans will probably be swayed into buying it anyway because the catch is that two new songs will be released along with it. Wheels and Word Forward, the former will soon have a video. So the die hards like me will probably shell out the $20 for the deluxe edition just to make the purchase worthwhile (it comes with a DVD of live video).

To give you a little context. In 1997, I was in the eighth grade. Until that time my exposure to music was very limited. I had probably heard of Led Zeppelin and also heard them but to bring a song to the artist would be impossible at that time. Plus I had decided I would be a country music fan and to my current disdain I listened to Alan Jackson and Shania Twain (should have been listening to Michael Jackson while reading Mark Twain…I’m reaching a bit here).

Around this time, certain friends of mine decided to have an intervention. They forced me to sit down and listen to what they called “alternative rock”. They played Green Day’s Dookie and No Doubt’s Tragic Kingdom. I liked them both after repeated listens in what is not quite a atmosphere from the classical conditioning sequence from A Clockwork Orange but it was close. Tragic Kingdom struck a chord specifically (though I thought what was soon to become their big hit single, Don’t Speak was the weakest track) due to the horns and poppy ska beat. To this day I love a good horn section. On a side note, check out The World Inferno Friendship Society.

While I had realized country music (or at least the pap of the country music world I was listening to) was not as good as I had once figured, I still hadn’t attached myself to a band in the rock world. I had missed the grunge movement by a few years but I was just on time to catch the Foo Fighters’ second album, The Colour and the Shape. Hanging out at my friend’s house one afternoon watching MuchMusic (when Bill Welychka was on…ah the good ole days) the video for Monkey Wrench came on and I was hooked. The song is raw and loud but with an incredibly catchy melody. It blended what I loved about ska with the hard rock sensibilities my friends were trying to force feed into me. The video was an odd and funny dreamlike vision about fighting with yourself and being your own worst enemy (or at least that’s what I took from it).

“They did that video Footos, right?” I asked my friend before I knew the name of that song to be Big Me.

“Yeah, they’re alright I guess,” he said.

It’s been that way for most of the 12 years since. I became a massive Foo Fighters fan while my friends all seemed rather apathetic. One friend loved the self titled record and has abhorred everything since. Another friend was on board for The Colour and the Shape and hasn’t cared since. A third friend adored There is Nothing Left to Lose and has been a fairly interested fan since, but not like me. Sure there are likely bigger Foo fans out there who have traveled long distance hundreds of times to see them (I’ve only seem them twice) but from my rinky dink small town I would bet dollars to donuts that I am the biggest fan of that band.

That said, a greatest hits record is not made for the hardcore fan. It’s made for the casual fan looking for all the hits they’ve already heard but with none of the effort it takes to get to know each album. That’s fine. In some cases it might even open the door to someone checking out the other lesser known tracks. It’s unlikely though as I have never once bought a CCR record since I acquired their Chronicle record.

On September 21, Rolling Stone’s website had an article (linked at the top) with the announcement of the tracklisting.

“All My Life”
“Best Of You”
“Everlong”
“The Pretender”
“My Hero”
“Learn To Fly”
“Times Like These”
“Monkeywrench”
“Big Me”
“Breakout”
“Long Road To Ruin”
“This is a Call”
“Skin and Bones”
“Wheels”
“Word Forward”
“Everlong (acoustic)”

Yep. Two versions of Everlong and not one of I’ll Stick Around, Alone and Easy Target, Hey Johnny Park, Stacked Actors, etc. Just once I think it’d be nice to see a greatest hits include some of the non-single favourites just to give it a little extra flavour or even an opportunity to surprise the casual fan who buys these cash grabs. I’d much rather have a new album but hey, two songs ain’t bad. For the hardcore fan it’s a disappointment, to the casual it probably doesn’t even register on the radar. At least Primus is re-releasing Frizzle Fry on vinyl in November, that might help me forget this. Okay, it’s not like this is a tragedy or anything, just a disappointment considering the Foo Fighters turned me into a rock and roll fan, it just seems cheap to me.

The Informant!

the-informant-poster1 a review by Jason Wilson

The Informant!
Directed by Steven Soderbergh
Screenplay by Scott Z. Burns adapted from the novel by Kurt Eichenwald
Starring Matt Damon, Scott Bakula, Melanie Lynskey, Joel McHale, Tony Hale.

From the beginning of The Informant, it is obvious that the film could have been told in the same vein as a Michael Crichton or John Grisham adaptation. It could have channelled Michael Mann’s masterpiece The Insider. Instead, Steven Soderbergh doesn’t play it straight; he twists the whistleblower story on its head.

Of course it’s mostly due to the main character Mark Whitacre (Damon). He seems like a nerdy, moral man with conviction about how he wants to lead his life. He gets wind of an extortion scheme against his company stemming from their illegal price fixing activity. Whitacre is an executive in a grain manufacturing company quickly climbing the corporate ladder when he suddenly becomes a federal mole. What a great guy!

It wouldn’t be much of a movie, based on truth or not, if that was the beginning and end of the story. Sure there’s conflict, but it would have been one way to a resolution. Luckily for the viewer, nothing is exactly as it seems, least of all Whitacre himself.
The ad campaign doesn’t exactly do the film justice. While much of The Informant is played for laughs – specifically Whitacre’s inner monologue – it carries with it a serious undertone. Whitacre is involved in a FBI investigation and while it bumbles along there are dire moments that send the film into the murky waters of drama and thriller. Mixing genre is a dicey choice because some audience members want to see one thing or another and they gear themselves to do so. If a viewer expects to see a comedic romp, he or she may not gel when the light hearted affair turns serious.

In this case, some may be put off that The Informant is not a full blown comedy like the trailers suggest. But it’s a breath of fresh air. Very little of the final act is revealed in the trailers. There is an element of surprise here. Unless you read the book you probably won’t know exactly where the film is going. Isn’t that worth some praise? If the film was garbage no. But The Informant is a well balanced movie with solid performances across the board.

informant

Damon’s Mark Whitacre is the goofiest face of all. Decked with a wild moustache, floppy hairdo and huge glasses he is unassuming and some might even believe an idiot savant. He acts so ridiculous and clueless throughout that it’s amazing this man could have reached top-tier employment within a mega-corporation. Then again…maybe it’s not so surprising. His manic idiocy (and compulsive lying) seemed like he belonged in last year’s espionage comedy by the Coen Brothers, Burn After Reading. He would have fit right in with the cast of dunces there. In this case, he is the odd character out, but it works.

Everyone else in the film is forced to play straight, as though they are in a serious dramatic film and it adds gravity to the outcome. While in Burn After Reading nothing was really at stake, people’s livelihoods are at risk here. The biggest surprise in casting the film was to see comedians Patton Oswalt, Paul F. Tompkins and Andy Daly playing serious roles while Damon is the one hamming it up.
While Whitacre’s inner monologue and his odd antics provide the bulk of the laughter, the musical score rounds it out. There’s a scene where the company is raided by the FBI and it could have been accompanied by a sweeping orchestral boom out of any courtroom thriller since The Firm or any other Grisham based movie. Instead Soderbergh uses a fluffy score reminiscent of the carnival-like theme to Curb Your Enthusiasm. It changes the mood entirely, just by swapping out one style of music for another.

The Informant is one big wink at the audience and by the end lives have crumbled and the whole truth seems further off than at the beginning. Some people will balk at the film when it’s over, claiming it not to be a satisfying conclusion. It’s dry and at times the comedy is abandoned entirely. Don’t let the trailers fool you, it’s not a mindless comedy but an intelligent thriller about corporate greed. It’s Michael Clayton with carnival music.

So we’re twits…

That’s right. Unfiltered Smoke is on twitter. While I always thought it seemed like a silly application, and I do still think this, it is useful in networking…I guess. I was reluctant but I joined anyway just to get added exposure. If RSS feeds or coming to this site everyday to check for updates isn’t your thing, follow the site on twitter at www.twitter.com/unfilteredsmoke. Huzzah, after all it’s not so bad being trendy.

The stuff dreams are made of

reading-a-book by Jason Wilson

Thank you to everyone who has sent in pieces and content to the site. More will come in the next few days, weeks and months. So if you haven’t seen your stuff here yet, it will make it on soon. I just want to space it out so I don’t splash it all and am left wondering what the hell to do next.

We have expanded the front page to include 10 entries at a time instead of 5. This way anyone visiting the site will be able to peruse what is here for some time without changing pages. Just to make it easier for you of course.

Also, comments will be operational in the next day or so. All we ask is that you provide your full name because anonymous comments are what make the internet more like a public bathroom stall. If you are critical, have the presence of mind to be up front about it. If you offer praise I am sure the writer/musician/photographer/etc. would like to know where it is coming from. All comments will be put up for approval to avoid spam and anonymous dreck that doesn’t serve a purpose. The contributors use their actual names, so should the commentors.

Updates have come fairly regularly this week with a new post each day. I will take the weekend off from publishing anything but next week I’ll figure out which days to regularly post. Unless of course a ton of new content comes flooding in every day and I have enough that daily updates are feasible. Also, for those of you interested in contributing, I would like it if you provided a picture and a brief write-up for the eventual profiles page.

Have a great weekend, go see Inglourious Basterds in theatres and send Unfiltered Smoke your creative output!

Jason (ratedargh@gmail.com)